Magazine

The uneasy but essential evolution of news

The power balance shift to a superuser audience

Technology and social media are shifting the power balance from publishers and broadcasters to consumers.

The audience, empowered with tools to choose, create, enrich and share, is the new superuser offering alternative information destinations.

To survive, media organisations must create a clear editorial differential and embrace changing audience behaviour.

Some have done well to adapt to their new role, others are struggling to keep up.

Media organisations must harness social media for news gathering and news dissemination, and create fact factories to deliver content to every device their audience turns to for information.

By doing so they could free up resources in order to focus on producing quality, original journalism. If they don’t they could suffer.

Media organisations have to embrace the empowered audience model, photo: Sueli Brodin, ENJN conference, EJC

1: The power and control is now in the hands of the audience

Technology has empowered the audience to the point where they are now users rather than consumers.

Now they have choice and turn to peer groups and trusted networks for recommendations.

Content has to be available in the format the audience demands, otherwise it has less chance of being used.

Broadcasters and publishers no longer control the process, the audience does.

2: The audience is now the superuser

When publishing and broadcasting was just about print, TV and radio we, the publishers and broadcasters, were the superusers.

Now, technology and social media tools have made the audience the superuser.

The audience is reworking content, enhancing it, making it more relevant for peer group sharing.

We must watch and map changing audience behaviour to remain relevant.

3: Multiple platform is essential not an option

We need to be on whatever device users turn to for their information.

If there is a platform we are missing there will be an audience we have lost.

We need to develop work flows and technical processes that enable us to enrich production on the outlets having most impact.

This means ditching our legacy mentality and switching resources to meet demand.

4: A shot in the arm for journalism

Technological advances and changing audience behaviour are liberating for journalism.

It means we can return to what we do best, which is establishing an editorial differential.

A way of doing this is to create a fact factory delivering to multiple platforms.

The news production line

Journalism is all about uncovering facts and delivering them to the audience. Along the way we check, verify, attribute, prioritise and add value to those facts. Then we present them. It’s a fairly simple production line logic; gather material, process it and then deliver it to the customer.

In many ways it’s similar to most production lines. News organisations are essentially fact factories; each trying to come up with a production formula and quality of product that best matches the needs of their target audience. In doing so they are trying to establish a differential that secures a viable presence in the market.

The broadcast at model

Before the internet and digital - when it was just about newspaper publishing and broadcasting - the models were fairly straightforward. We, the media, published and broadcast at the audience.

We did our market research, and we created products we thought would sell, but there was no audience engagement – unless you count carefully selected letters to the editors and heavily produced talk shows.

The publish and broadcast at model is dead.

The engage with on our terms model

Gradually we allowed the audience to be part of the process, but only on our terms.

We would publish letters to the editor, invite participants to take part in live TV and radio shows and encourage people to comment on our online forums.

But we would select the topics for discussion and we would only publish or air those comments that fitted our editorial thrust.

The engage with on our terms model is in its death throes.

The disruption of digital

The participate model

Digital and online media changed all that in three main ways:

1: more outlets appeared competing for the attention of the audience
2:. more devices were produced with which the audience could consume news and information
3: more opportunities to engage with news and news makers became available.
4: the audience turned to peer group recommendation
5: readers and viewers were empowered with free tools to become their own media brands.

Media organisations have to embrace the empowered audience model.

Technological advances and changing audience behaviour are liberating for journalism, photo: Sueli Brodin, ENJN conference, EJC

Caught off guard by the speed of change

What the media organisations failed to grasped at first – and it’s understandable because things changed so fast – was that news had to be delivered to the audience on whatever device they turned to, not just on the main legacy platform – be it print or broadcast.

Media organisations were thinking on their feet and the result wasn’t always pretty or effective.

The industry tried its best to respond as new audience-distracting devices/platforms appeared.

Publishers and broadcasters created websites and produced mobile and digital versions of their content to try to keep up.

Much of it, at first, was a copy-paste version of the main product, sometimes produced off-site, in some cases by a different team working away from the main newsroom.

It was a brave effort, although it was fraught with problems, many of which were down to a lack of having an editorial strategy.

Embracing convergence

In 1997 I was one of the editors asked to set up and launch BBC News Online. In order to get the site up and running we had to build a new newsroom, hire new staff and fight to get hold of any content from our broadcast colleagues. We were seen as a poor relation and a bit of a distraction to many; some also clearly saw us as competition.

The broadcasters were on the first floor at BBC Television Centre in London, we were on the seventh. They guarded their content in order to protect their scheduled programmes, whereas we wanted to publish the news as it happened and update it day and night, 24/7.

Two years later I was hired to be the launch managing editor for CNN.com Europe Middle East and Africa (EMEA). It was the first international English-language version of CNN to be produced outside of America.

At first the plan was that we would build our own newsroom and create a new global site with an EMEA focus. Because of space restriction we had to occupy a different floor to our broadcast colleagues, but in terms of cooperation around news, the attitude couldn’t have been different. We put all our efforts into convergence. We shared news meetings, prospects, staff and technical resources.

Because of that I was able to introduce a system of publishing called MPA (multiplatform authoring) where content created once by one journalist could go out in an instant on multiple revenue-generating platforms. At one stage we were serving 10 such platforms at the press of the save button.

A few years later, as an editorial and strategy consultant for the launch of Al Jazeera English, we were working with one converged newsroom based around a centralised command-and-control superdesk where all the main news decisions were made. Amazing how much had changed over such a short period.

Leapfrogging legacy problems

For the last 10 years I have been advising on the creation of converged newsrooms for both print and broadcast media organisations worldwide, setting up converged newsrooms in Africa, the Middle East, the Caucasus and Asia.

Things continue to move at a rapid pace. A big driver has been the growth of mobile and the decline in the use of so-called traditional mainstream media.

What also seems apparent is that media houses outside the heavily-developed Western media scene are often far more agile and able to adapt and evolve without all the navel gazing, table thumping and kicking and screaming that can take place where legacy workflows, roles and responsibilities, empires and influence are entrenched.

I have introduced converged newsrooms in Tbilisi, Hanoi and Harare simply by moving a few chairs and desks and setting up a central superdesk.

Sometimes it’s involved knocking down a few partition walls and creating a space where everyone can breathe the same news air and hear the same news calls.

In all cases it’s been important to help media managers and journalists understand that if they share and work together they can create a more dynamic, compelling and user-focused product than if they fight their own corner.

Of course it helps when there is total buy-in from the top where those in charge realise that convergence is a must-have business essential rather than a disruptive distraction.

Those of us who are in the business of producing news need to ensure that we are delivering content to whatever device the audience is turning to in order to access information, photo: Skokie Public Library (some rights reserved)

A change of thinking is needed

The time has come for publishers to forget they are publishers and for broadcasters to forget they are broadcasters.

Those of us who are in the business of producing news need to ensure that we are delivering content to whatever device the audience is turning to in order to access information.

If there is a platform where we don’t have a presence we are missing an opportunity and probably haemorrhaging an audience. Once that happens we have lost the battle.

If our production priorities, workflows, roles and responsibilities and resources are all focused on one platform only, we may be not only limiting our news organisation’s growth but also losing audience and revenue.

And if we deliver to a new platform we need to ensure that we enrich that content with the appropriate added value to make our offering the most rewarding.

We are asking the audience to give us its time - a precious resource - and the audience will only come back if that experience is the best they can get in the time they have available and on the device they use.

How we respond to these digital demands will play a decisive role in deciding whether we will survive as a media business. The good news is that it can be done, is being done, and it isn’t as hard as it sounds.

This article was written as background material for a media strategy event for publishers and broadcasters being held in Ukraine in April 2012.

The author of this piece, David Brewer, is a journalist and media strategy consultant who set up and runs the website Media Helping Media. He delivers media strategy training and consultancy services worldwide and his business details are at Media Ideas International Ltd. He tweets @helpingmedia. This article was originally published at Media Helping Media under a Creative Commons License.

Tags: audience, behaviour, broadcaster, consumer, content, convergence, demand, empowered, information, internet, journalism, media, model, platform, power balance, publisher, resources, shift, social media, superuser, technology, trust,

Related articles

• Don’t Be Fooled: Use the SMELL Test To Separate Fact from Fiction Online
• DocumentCloud: Analyse, Annotate, Publish.
• GEN News Summit 2013: HACK THE NEWSROOM! Event
• Applications open for health journalism contest offering a US study tour
• Innovation Director Gavin Sheridan on the Future of Digital Newsgathering
• Emergency Journalism Toolkit
• After Tsunami, Japanese Media Swept up in Wave of Distrust
• Gunfight at the UK Corral
• 5 Steps to Verifying User-Generated Content
• Pope Francis, Shine the Light of Transparency on the Holy See

• Home |
• Seminars  |
• Events |
• Media Landscape |
• Newsroom|
• Media News|
• Resources

Terms of service and Privacy policy.

Copyright © 1992- 2013 European Journalism Centre. All rights reserved.

Valid XHTML and CSS.

European Journalism Centre

Sonneville-lunet 10
6221KT Maastricht
The Netherlands

Tel. : +31 43 325 40 30
Fax : +32 2 400 42 20

E-mail: info[at]ejc.net